Both previous revivals produced high-quality doctrine and curriculum in professional-education courses. In both of the previous periods, the topic enjoyed a celebrity-like popularity in professional military forums until such time that circumstances allowed it to be relegated back to the margins in favor of a return to proper soldiering. military experienced a revival of interest in irregular warfare, or IW, similar to the one that is occurring today. In 2009, I wrote an article as part of an introduction for an IW conference at Ft Bragg in which I said, “In the 1960s and again in the 1980s, the U.S. military has been in this position before, multiple times. While this sounds completely appropriate, there is a problem. There is no shortage of speeches, articles and documents that extol the importance of the topic to the National Defense Strategy and its related concepts. military finds itself addressing how it will institutionalize the topic of Irregular Warfare (IW). Ukrainians do not exist!”Īs 2023 begins, the U.S. At the same time, Russian teachers arrive in Russia-occupied Ukrainian towns and cities and diligently follow the orders of their Russian “bosses” beating into the heads of Ukrainian children Russia’s vision of Ukraine: “Ukraine as a sovereign state does not exist” and “Ukrainians are confused about their nationality-in essence, you are Russians who, under the influence of external Western forces, erroneously decided that you are Ukrainians. Russia perpetuates its plan to depopulate the occupied parts of Ukraine and to deport both adults and children to Russia. The number of civilians who became victims of Russia’s atrocious assault is growing and the country’s infrastructure is in imminent danger of collapse. During the past months, the Kremlin has continued to engage in ongoing combat efforts, artillery shelling, and missile and drone attacks targeting civilian infrastructure across the country. Russia’s brutal war against Ukraine has entered its second year. While the United States needs to focus first domestically, neglecting international efforts to combat climate insecurity will only further the loss in adversarial competition while endangering US national security. This allows these maligned actors access economic, military, and political advantages through providing resources and infrastructure to these fragile populations. The oversight of the near-term consequences of destructive climate events such as drought, flooding, rising sea levels, etc., resulting in resource scarcity for vulnerable populations has allowed adversaries of the United States to capitalize on these vulnerable states. The current lines of effort for the DOD Climate Adaptation Plan would benefit from an additional measure that is proactive and international at its base. However, this approach is not a sufficient response to the complexity of climate insecurity. As the US military continues to develop its climate security strategy and action plans, the current publications and programs only briefly mention proactive international actions by enhancing disaster relief and humanitarian assistance efforts.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |